a) Do not use two colors in the name "doxacom".
b) No problem with keeping two colors in the symbol in a main version
c) The logotype must be able to appear in one color (included inverted versions).
d) I prefer the large letter versions best; "DOXACOM".
e) Like a No. 2 version with "corporate communications" integrated
f) Please no grey (or other) background behind the logo on main versions.
g) Please avoid drop shadows and 3D effects on main versions.
h) Logotypes with possibilities to alternate between the symbol on the left, and the symbol in the centre above the name gives flexibility.
i) Keep it simple
j) Drafts rated with 4 stars are considered as very close.
k) Drafts rated with 1 star is not considered.
#24, 25, 26, 29, 31, 54, 56; you have used two colors in the name "doxacom". I would like to see how your designs looks like with one color in the letters, but no problem with keeping the two colors in the symbol.
#24, 25 and 42 shows how the logotype will appear in one color (included inverted). I like that. Also # 31 and 57 shows a simple version of the logotype. That´s good.
Some of you have written the name with a large "D" and the rest with small letters; "Doxacom". I am not sure yet, but I think i like the large letter versions best; "DOXACOM".
I would like to see a secondary version with "corporate communications" along with the logotype (like #41), but not as a main version.
Some of you are putting a grey background behind the logo. Please show main versions without any background.
Please avoid drop shadows.
#24 and 25 gives one version of the logotype with the symbol on the left, and one with the symbol in the centre above the name. That gives a kind of flexibility on stationaries etc. Positive.
Things might change, but favorites so far:
1: #57
2: #31
3: #24/25
4: #26/29
I will now start to give some general feedback by rate the designs using the stars from 1 to 3. 1 star = “not great” meaning that it will not be considered. 3 stars = “on the right track”. I might give direct comments / suggestions for getting closer to what I´m looking for.
3 Commentaire récents
Porteur du Projet
I would like you to focus on the following.
a) Do not use two colors in the name "doxacom".
b) No problem with keeping two colors in the symbol in a main version
c) The logotype must be able to appear in one color (included inverted versions).
d) I prefer the large letter versions best; "DOXACOM".
e) Like a No. 2 version with "corporate communications" integrated
f) Please no grey (or other) background behind the logo on main versions.
g) Please avoid drop shadows and 3D effects on main versions.
h) Logotypes with possibilities to alternate between the symbol on the left, and the symbol in the centre above the name gives flexibility.
i) Keep it simple
j) Drafts rated with 4 stars are considered as very close.
k) Drafts rated with 1 star is not considered.
Thanks
Brgds
Doxacom
Porteur du Projet
#24, 25 and 42 shows how the logotype will appear in one color (included inverted). I like that. Also # 31 and 57 shows a simple version of the logotype. That´s good.
Some of you have written the name with a large "D" and the rest with small letters; "Doxacom". I am not sure yet, but I think i like the large letter versions best; "DOXACOM".
I would like to see a secondary version with "corporate communications" along with the logotype (like #41), but not as a main version.
Some of you are putting a grey background behind the logo. Please show main versions without any background.
Please avoid drop shadows.
#24 and 25 gives one version of the logotype with the symbol on the left, and one with the symbol in the centre above the name. That gives a kind of flexibility on stationaries etc. Positive.
Things might change, but favorites so far:
1: #57
2: #31
3: #24/25
4: #26/29
Porteur du Projet
I will now start to give some general feedback by rate the designs using the stars from 1 to 3. 1 star = “not great” meaning that it will not be considered. 3 stars = “on the right track”. I might give direct comments / suggestions for getting closer to what I´m looking for.