Mycroburst.com - Home
English | Français | العربية

877-525-5646

Equipe commerciale: du lundi au samedi, de 13h00 à 17h00 CET
Assistance technique: du lundi au samedi, de 13h00 à 17h00 CET



Démarrez un projet Parcourez les projets

Wellworks

Wellworks


Comment Réussir un Projet


  • Rapport du projet

Gagné

Modèle #111 Choisi en tant que gagnant

Un logo, monogramme ou une icône | Crée par Mattijs

  • Gains
    199,00 $ Garanti
  • Créations
    191
  • Fermer
  •  Gagnants
    1
    Plus d’info

Classez les modèles par:

  • Lisez Bref


Discussion

7 Commentaire récents

  • 13 décembre 2009 23:58 SiteAdmin
    Employé(e)

    Congratulations! Dave0585, Contest holder has selected your design #111 as Winner. Thanks to ALL Designers for their creativity and hard work. Thanks

  • 12 décembre 2009 11:10 Mattijs
    Porteur du Projet

    Thanks again,

    My remarks of today as follows:
    draft #122: black instead of blue is indeed a better choice - please show examples with different font-types also for 'WELLWORKS'.
    draft #120: nice ! - I like the reflexion - I was wondereing how it would work with the inclusion of 'wellworks, well services engineering & consultancy' - also how it would look on a white background.
    draft #112-107: good red color - no large 'W' for first 'w' is indeed a better choice - please show examples with black background.
    draft #96: please show variaties in size, line thickness, colors, no large 'W', etc.
    Thanks,

  • 11 décembre 2009 13:08 Mattijs
    Porteur du Projet

    Hello all,
    Thanks for all the concepts. I have 'eliminated' the concepts that do not suit my business. For the other concepts my comments are as follows:
    draft #80: font could be stronger, more modern - no green but red or blue.
    draft #75: looks good in color as well as in b&w - suggest a less 'royal' atmosphere - color more red.
    draft #73: looks good in b&w - not sure about the color version.
    draft #72: original concept - good shades - less pointy at the ends would suit me better - should indeed indicate 2x tubes in a 'W' shape.
    draft #67: strong and good font - would like to see examples in other colors - varieties in 'WW' symbol size and shape.
    draft #66: well balanced concept - brown color coul be stronger - shoulb 'WW' not be more centralized above 2ns 'w' of Wellworks? - color varieties.
    draft #61/62: Strong - please show red examples.
    draft #40: strong logo - please show color variety.
    draft #38: well balanced - complete concept - please show variety in colors.
    draft #31: still attractive concept - 2ns 'w' in small caps - please show different color combinations and examples on white background (in stead of black).
    Thanks

  • 11 décembre 2009 11:17 swhinck

    Am I wrong in assuming this logo will be used mostly for printwork?

  • 7 décembre 2009 13:33 Mattijs
    Porteur du Projet

    First, thanks for all the submissions. I am also interested to view the suggestions in black & white next to the color proposal. Comments that I have are as follows:
    #33: good, strong font - the logo does not really relate to oil & gas business - still see potential in varities.
    #32: too complex & too many different shapes.
    #31: like it - nice font - prefer second 'w' not being a capital - good 'energy', may suggest more subtile logo - see potential in varities.
    #30: Also nice - prefer second 'w' not being a capital - the 'ww'logo does make me think of a spring a bit - see potential in varities.
    #29: same.
    #28: color combination not so fine - like the attempt in splitting the 'W' - see potential in varities.
    #27: too 'happy' - looking for abstract / symbollic logos.
    #26: same comments as 28.
    #25: same comments as 28.
    #24: like the 3D effect - colours too strong - prefer 2nd 'w' to b not a capital - see potential in varities.
    #23: logo does not really fit the industry - fine color combination.
    #22: logo does not really fit the industry - black/blue color combination I do not prefer.
    #21: too complex - too much going on.
    #20: too complex - too much going on.
    #19: too complex - too much going on.
    #13: like that idea with the W a lot - prefer stronger font type (blue part) - nice abstract idea - see potential in varities.
    #12: Overall not what I am looking for.
    #11: nice font type - black & white suggestion also looks quite good - overlay of the droplet over the font I like - see potential in varities.
    #10: too flower-like - nice font type - see potential in varities.
    #09: same as 10.
    #08: too crowded.
    #07: too crowded.
    #04: too crowded.
    #03: donkey-head to commonly used - looking for abstract ideasn- color combination not so fine.
    #02: too crowded.
    #01: logo does not really fit the industry - see other comments.

    Summary:
    I like ideas like the W in #13, or other attemps that can and have been made with single or double 'w's. Strong modern font types I like over old-school. color combinations I am not so sure of. Concept also needs to look good in b&w. No clear indicators like donkey-head, screwdrivers, etc. Logo may 'hint'to oil and gas industry (work in gas and oil wells).
    Many thanks,
    Tijs

  • 6 décembre 2009 22:50 badoeng

    Please eliminate the rejected design. Thanx.

  • 5 décembre 2009 04:33 SiteAdmin
    Employé(e)

    Good news for designers! Contest holder has converted the contest into Guaranteed. Start adding your design submissions. Thanks