Mycroburst.com - Home
English | Français | العربية

877-525-5646

Equipe commerciale: du lundi au samedi, de 13h00 à 17h00 CET
Assistance technique: du lundi au samedi, de 13h00 à 17h00 CET



Démarrez un projet Parcourez les projets

Logo for Healthy Building Science

Healthy Building Science


Comment Réussir un Projet


  • Rapport du projet

Gagné

Modèle #89 Choisi en tant que gagnant

Un logo, monogramme ou une icône | Crée par astadtner

  • Gains
    400,00 $ Garanti
  • Créations
    105
  • Fermer
  •  Gagnants
    1
    Plus d’info

Classez les modèles par:

  • Lisez Bref


Discussion

25 Commentaire récents

  • 19 avril 2012 01:07 turion

    ok

  • 18 avril 2012 16:31 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    84/88/89 - possible to make the other "window panes" squares... to make it look more like a window... with one of the panes being the nice leaf?

  • 18 avril 2012 08:57 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    82 can you submit just one larger image of the mark so we can see the details more closely. There seems to be something going on off the left corner ridge of the roof of the house.

  • 18 avril 2012 08:55 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    82 looks pretty darn nice. Nice combination of commercial and residential. The leaf helps convey sustainable and "green." Like the rework of the "house." I'm wondering what it might look like with the top half of the circle being a more "sciency" shape... like a hexagon or octagon? The circle does look nice and clean, but feel experimenting with the top half of the circle may help project "science?" The bottom half could stay a circle so the leaf image isn't affected - just more squared out corners above the buildings... It may not look right, but now I'm curious.

  • 18 avril 2012 08:50 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    83 too corporate.

  • 18 avril 2012 08:49 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    84 - really like what you did with the window - turning one into an obvious leaf. Window looks sharp. Actually preferred the previous overall shape of 59, but the windows of 84. Or maybe even just windows alone in a circle? Or the windows on just a leaf... a leaf like what was started on #5 on your first designs?

  • 18 avril 2012 08:46 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    80/81 feel that the leaf has lost its form and the circle is too forced... doesn't add anything.

  • 17 avril 2012 19:50 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    79 - let me ponder the new color. Hoping the house can look a little more like a house.

    More fond of the leaf placement in #61

  • 17 avril 2012 19:49 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    76/77 - after the coackroach logos we eliminated it's hard to take you seriously.

    These concepts look like frowning faces.

  • 17 avril 2012 19:48 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    67 - not especially fond of our initials, and find the skyline too busy.

  • 17 avril 2012 19:47 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    64/65 - nice looking, but going for something with a "building" look. Not too corporate, not too commercial or residential, not too hippy. Tough concept.

  • 17 avril 2012 19:45 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    #78 - the leaf at the top does not look as good as the other version, like #61, with the leaf at the bottom. The second leaf (outside of the circle) looks out of balance, and the inner leaf is remniscent of a comb-over.

    Like that word science appeared a little bigger, and not considering having all three words in the same type size...

    Like that the shadow and extra line's besides "science" are removed in this version.

    Possible to make the "house" in front a little more like a house? We though that maybe by adding eves or a soffit it would look more like a house.

    Honestly like the look of #61 better, but the same comments apply to both. If you could post your next versions in one that is larger it would be great. We cannot enlarge what we receive without getting really grainy.

    Thank you.

  • 17 avril 2012 14:13 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    61 Pros:

    - Type treatment feels professional
    - illustration style "feels" right. Not to corporate, not too hippie.
    - illustration feels very strong and confident.

    Cons:
    - the icon feels a little too large relative to the type. hard to read text at small size.
    - The illustration is focused on business buildings. The building in front is not strongly coming across as a house. pump up the "house-ness" a little. (without adding a chimney please!)
    - On dark background version, green type is difficult to read and the word "building" stands out too much.
    - the drop shadow plus the lines around the word "science" are a little busy.

    Overall: I like this one also, just that house in the front and the type size are the only things that are holding it back.

  • 17 avril 2012 14:11 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    59 pros & cons all mixed together:

    - icon feels better, although it's lost some of it's aggressiveness. not that that's a bad thing.
    - I'm ok with just the house (as opposed to buildings) in the icon, because the type has a slightly professional feel. The icon and the type treatment balance each other out.
    - the type is lacking just a little personality. It's a super super subtle thing but if the "Healthy Building" had just a teensy bit more character (similar to the type in 61 and 63), I think it would be perfect.
    - I'd be curious to see a version of this logo with the original leaf (with the pointed bottom). But without it's blue top. Just a simple leaf with no windows either. that leaf conveyed some confidence.

    Overall: the icon is now recognizable as something and looked pretty good.

  • 17 avril 2012 14:08 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    62: cons:

    - Type is boring and dated, no variation in font, or size.
    - The idea of "green" gets lost, can barely see the leaf
    - swoopy blue circle in illustration feels dated

  • 17 avril 2012 14:06 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    63: Pros:
    - Type treatment feels professional
    - illustration style "feels" right. Not to corporate, not too hippie.

    Cons:
    - the icon feels a little too large relative to the type. Experiment with size relationship. It should be easy to read at small sizes so the text should start at larger relative size to it's icon.
    - Larger leaf somehow unbalances the design. Looks like the blue circle has a comb-over.
    - On dark background version, green type is difficult to read and the word "building" stands out too much.
    -Experiment with all words being the same size, and Healthy Building in the same color, and all white when over the black background
    - frontmost Building in illustration is difficult to discern.
    - the drop shadow plus the lines around the word "science" are a little busy. try making the word science bigger, removing the drop shadow, and eliminating the two dashes on the side of "Science."

  • 16 avril 2012 18:25 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    #53 looks interesting. Any other ideas for incorporating "sustainability" or "health"? Could the circle be cut from a leaf? Or the top-half of the Earth/globe? Or any other ideas?

    We like the way #47 incorporated the leaf in a unique way.

    #55 - we're doing away with the magnifying glass concept. It doesn't encompass the green building consulting work we do.

  • 16 avril 2012 18:14 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    #54 - not using the magnifying glass any more. And there cannot be a chimney in the logo.

  • 16 avril 2012 13:35 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    #50 - We liked the way the green and blue played off each other. Like a stronger blue - like in #5... and perhaps a stronger green. It's nice and clear and simple... but maybe too simple?

  • 16 avril 2012 13:32 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    #47 - can we see this mark larger? Go for stronger blue - like in #5.

  • 16 avril 2012 12:14 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    #48 – we’re moving away from the magnifying glass look because much of our business focuses on design/construction consulting. Nice concept – but the wrong one for the current business model. The overall look is not too striking, and the shape of the buildings is too “commercial.”

  • 16 avril 2012 12:14 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    47/49 – 47 is looking pretty nice. I still prefer the even bolder colors of #5. More powerful blue and perhaps darker green. 47 with a black background looks really sharp. 48 – if we were all about water I’d like the “drop” concept, but we’re not all about water so I think a round circle – or other shape – better than the rain drop. Can you experiment with putting the buildings (and maybe leaf) from #47 into the more “scientific” shape of #8. Something other than a simple circle? Like the overall style though.

  • 16 avril 2012 12:14 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    40/41/42/43 – Thank you for incorporating the Fibinacci spiral into your concepts. However, these all feel too busy and cluttered with too many colors and intricate details. Neat concepts… but they’re really too busy. Cannot have a chimney like 40.

  • 16 avril 2012 12:13 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    39/50 – The combined look of the commercial and residential style buildings is pretty sharp, but I really like the stronger colors and type from #5. This could work… feel like the extra lines around the circle in 39 don’t add much, but that they both don’t really say anything about “healthy.” That may be okay… but do you have any ideas on how to somehow give the impression of healthy? Possible to see this concept in a more “sciency” shape like #8 – instead of the simple circle?

  • 16 avril 2012 12:13 astadtner
    Porteur du Projet

    38/44/45/46 – The overall shape is not doing it for me. Liked the original blue/green type and colors… but the mark itself is not finished. The boat/rain drop shape is hard to get away from… The overall shape is still confusing and not clear. Is it possible to explore the leaf and window concept in a more “scientific” shape? Like #8?