@box1508: draft #88, #89, #92 and #93 definitely looked better now compared to your previous designs. I wonder why you make the middle leaf tilt so much to the left in the first place.
@yokorama: draft #76 is not too bad actually, but I feel earth based logo is not suitable for my company.
@KeysoftTechnologies: draft #77 is not what I had in mind, but I find this design quite interesting and nice. Definitely will be considering this one. However, I find #79 to be unsuitable.
@teroristd: draft #80 and #81 is too simple and common. It reminds me of the romans.
@1661Design: I find draft #82 is a bit strange looking. Not sure what the shape supposed to be.
@box1508: draft #17 and #54 seems to have the better font. I would like to see whether it is better if you make the middle leaf straighter (but not completely straight) and make the middle stalk a little shorter. You can use the font type in draft #17, make "Uni Agro" in green and "CHEMICA" in blue. Lets put a space between "Uni" and "Agro", I am curious how it will look.
@Irenecreations: in draft #49 , can you make the two wheat bigger? Perhaps it will look better. I think currently its a bit thin/small.
To all designers: I want to remind everybody that I am open to other ideas that you think is nice and suitable for my company. Something that is serious and not too cartoony. It does not have to be specifically leaf, plants, padi, wheat or other agriculture stuff. That is why one of the logo example I gave is Novartis, which have a non-agriculture theme. Thank you.
@box1508: In draft #17, I like the design on the left down corner better, where the logo is on the left side of company name. I like the font type too. But I would like to see another variation with a slightly more serious font type for comparison. Thank you.
@jtscreative: Draft #39 is too cute. Need a more serious design. I am not sure about the test tube though.
@Irenecreations: Draft #42 is nice. But I think we need to get rid of the tiny glitter at the end of one of the wheat. Also I would like to remove the small leaf at the end of "CHEMICA". I would like to see the same changes applied on draft #43. I think the logo in draft #43 is too small in comparison to the company name. I think need to make the logo bigger.
@irenecreations: #29 and #30 are not the right type of logo. The company name should not be part of the logo (non-logo type). #26, #27, #28 are too simple.
@jtscreative: #24 and #25 is getting too crowded. Previous design is better :) What about designing completely new different logos rather than improving on the one that you submitted?
@jtscreative: #20 and #21 is slightly better looking than #9. Perhaps you can submit a new different concept? In this contest, I have yet to see a design like Strutt and Parker: http://www.spfarms.co.uk
@BDesign: I see where you going with #18, combining the chemical and plant element, but somehow I feel it's not suitable
The entries so far have been very simple in my opinion. Perhaps its because I mention "simple" in my creative brief. I guess I need a more complex one :)
Apologies for the misunderstanding if thats the case.
@jtscreative: draft #6 and #7 is not bad. I like #7 better. I would have rate #7 a 3 star actually, but both are not the right type of logo. I am looking for a logo where the company name is not part of the logo (non-logo type)
21 Commentaire récents
Employé(e)
Porteur du Projet
Thank you very much for all the effort and hard work that you put into this project. I really appreciate it.
Porteur du Projet
Porteur du Projet
@BDesign: I'm sorry, but draft #86 is simply not what I'm looking for.
@karent: I think your draft #97 and #98 is not suitable for a pesticide company.
Porteur du Projet
@KeysoftTechnologies: draft #77 is not what I had in mind, but I find this design quite interesting and nice. Definitely will be considering this one. However, I find #79 to be unsuitable.
@teroristd: draft #80 and #81 is too simple and common. It reminds me of the romans.
@1661Design: I find draft #82 is a bit strange looking. Not sure what the shape supposed to be.
Porteur du Projet
@FARnaw101: draft #75 is too cartoony and too cute
Porteur du Projet
Porteur du Projet
Porteur du Projet
Porteur du Projet
@Irenecreations: in draft #49 , can you make the two wheat bigger? Perhaps it will look better. I think currently its a bit thin/small.
Porteur du Projet
Porteur du Projet
@jtscreative: Draft #39 is too cute. Need a more serious design. I am not sure about the test tube though.
@Irenecreations: Draft #42 is nice. But I think we need to get rid of the tiny glitter at the end of one of the wheat. Also I would like to remove the small leaf at the end of "CHEMICA". I would like to see the same changes applied on draft #43. I think the logo in draft #43 is too small in comparison to the company name. I think need to make the logo bigger.
Porteur du Projet
Porteur du Projet
Porteur du Projet
Porteur du Projet
@BDesign: I see where you going with #18, combining the chemical and plant element, but somehow I feel it's not suitable
Porteur du Projet
@Markus: #11 is also too simple.
The entries so far have been very simple in my opinion. Perhaps its because I mention "simple" in my creative brief. I guess I need a more complex one :)
Apologies for the misunderstanding if thats the case.
Porteur du Projet
Strutt and Parker: http://www.spfarms.co.uk
Agroseeder: http://www.agroseeder.com
Novartis: http://www.novartis.com
Porteur du Projet
Porteur du Projet
@zeeshanshams: draft #4 and #5 also too simple and not what I have in mind.