Mycroburst.com - Home
English | Français | العربية

877-525-5646

Equipe commerciale: du lundi au samedi, de 13h00 à 17h00 CET
Assistance technique: du lundi au samedi, de 13h00 à 17h00 CET



Démarrez un projet Parcourez les projets

Creative logo for online florist

Fineflora.com


Comment Réussir un Projet


  • Rapport du projet

Gagné

Modèle #161 Choisi en tant que gagnant

Un logo, monogramme ou une icône | Crée par brightwire

  • Gains
    250,00 $ Garanti
  • Créations
    165
  • Fermer
  •  Gagnants
    1
    Plus d’info

Classez les modèles par:

  • Lisez Bref


Discussion

23 Commentaire récents

  • 26 mars 2010 13:51 kugajevska

    Congratulations!

  • 26 mars 2010 06:35 SiteAdmin
    Employé(e)

    Congratulations! koncepts, Contest Holder has selected your design #161 as Winner. Thanks to all the designers for their creativity and hard work. Thanks

  • 25 mars 2010 11:53 koncepts

    Thanks everyone. Thanks a lot BrightWire for approving my concept #161 !
    Will send the source files within 24 hours to MBStaff!

    Thanks !!!

  • 24 mars 2010 19:13 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Thank you to everyone for submitting such fabulous designs. We have really struggled to choose and it was a very close call. Congratulations to the winning design #161 by koncepts. To everyone else thank you so much for some brilliant creativity and artwork.

  • 24 mars 2010 13:21 koncepts

    Colors, fonts, effects will be changed as requested for the selected concept !

  • 17 mars 2010 16:28 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Hi All -

    really delighted by the brilliant work so far. Thank you - too many to focus on individual comments and there are some cracking designs here. We will rate now once the contest is over. Thank you again!

  • 12 mars 2010 16:19 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    All - thanks for the nice work so far, still looking for more routes and will start proper rating soon.

  • 12 mars 2010 16:13 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    RenDol your #33 is good but doesn’t work for us, our first impressions were of a fun vacation! :) we’re looking for something a little more delicate and upmarket. Any questions, please ask – thanks.

  • 12 mars 2010 16:13 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Demigraphix like the new version #32 a lot and am tempted to ask what it might look like in pink :) Your #31 is really nice too, the device works well and the typeface is a good choice though would like to see if it works as a handwritten one. Great direction this is taking, thanks.

  • 12 mars 2010 16:12 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Julaine your version #30 works much better though am wondering if you can play around with the colours. Only thing that struck us here was that it may be better if it was more ‘delicate’ and think one flower symbol might work better than 2 (on the ‘i’, probably). Thanks!

  • 12 mars 2010 16:12 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Midephoto I see where you’re at with #28 and #29 but not sure it grabs me. There’s a bit too much going on for us and we’d prefer the name on a single line. Think colours would also need to be a bit stronger to make it attention grabbing. Thanks.

  • 12 mars 2010 16:11 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Skumarpune #25 and #26 work well but not sure about the supersize typeface. Neat idea with the petals though they might look a little flame-like, if you get what I mean. Loving your #24 and #27, this is definitely a nice route and I can see this on different media – it’s good and strong, with creative flair and style and that sense of being upmarket, with nice choice of typeface and colours. The 6 petal flower works better than the 4 petal image you’ve got on the pink variant of #24. Lovely work, thanks.

  • 12 mars 2010 16:11 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Sujeet #23 works better and like the three-flower device at the top, but on the whole there may be too many flowers in the name now :) what if you drop the one in the .com? Thanks.

  • 12 mars 2010 16:10 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Juancharlos #20 is interesting but think the blue and caps makes it a little cold. It doesn’t shout “stylish flowers” at me on first impression but I like the petal idea. Thanks.

  • 11 mars 2010 19:53 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    All, thanks for the routes so far. Bear in mind we need a strong logo which gives a real sense of our gorgeous stylish, fresh and colourful bouquets and flowers as well as our down to earth & reliable nature (customer service & flower delivery). The new logo will be the key to our fantastic new website and all our packaging so it needs to be fabulous.

    Totally looking for some creative magic and a real WOW factor. I know from the designs on this site this can be done with simplicity and a clear, clean style and we’re hoping to get an outstanding logo. I've attached some logos we think are creatively excellent as examples - please see the new pdf in the brief. Any questions please ask!

  • 11 mars 2010 19:38 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Demigraphix like the idea of #9 though not sure about the shadow on the typeface, and font may be a bit too ‘blocky’. Like your #18 a lot lot more – especially the rose device which works really well on the ‘O’ and has a really nice flourish to it (same comment on the shadow though) and typeface is better though might be seen as a bit too topsy turvy. #19 is definitely heading in the right direction: friendly, personal and stylish with nice font choice and good use of colours to strengthen it - could see this style working across different media. Not sure about the rose on the ‘i’ – what about playing around with this, removing the leaves or making them smaller? Thanks!

  • 11 mars 2010 19:36 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Kugajevska your #10 is nice though first impression was device looks a little like a bird :) Nice choice of colours and font here – bit more of a formal, heavily scripted typeface than I had in mind across them all though, what about something softer? Like the use of the symbol as the O but #11 might work better without the 2 leaves (am seeing birds here again!) – flowers are OK on this and #12 but don’t like the flower device on #13. Not entirely convinced about blocks of orange though like I said the non-block/open flower illustration works better on #11. Thanks!

  • 11 mars 2010 19:34 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Rudyy – #14 OK not crazy about the style here nor the colourway – on first impression looks a little like a plant :) We do sell plants but it's not core: we’re selling top quality flowers and beautiful stylish bouquets which needs to come across more clearly. Any questions please ask, thanks.

  • 11 mars 2010 19:32 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    jp1876 still not mad about the flower but and the new typeface seems a bit too solid for us, can you play around with this at all? #16 looks better where the device is a little smaller. Could do with the .com being moved up to same line on this and #15. What about different choice of colours/tones eg lime green? Would like to see something a little softer here if poss. Thanks.

  • 11 mars 2010 19:28 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Juliane your #17 has a nice typeface and like the flower but not the leaves – feel they’re a bit too out of place. Same comment as earlier – we feel the brand name should be more prominent than the device if poss. Thanks.

  • 11 mars 2010 10:16 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    jp1876 neat idea with the stem - my first thought was flower looked a bit droopy, though I see where you're going with this :)I feel the name should be bigger than the symbol as we're trying to create brand recognition of Fineflora - think Proflowers.com but a bit more creative/flowery! #7 does look better with the .com in the same colourway as the rest. Any questions just ask, thanks!

  • 11 mars 2010 09:40 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Nice ideas Sujeet, like the flowers of #3 best. The 3 line style doesn't work for us though and not sure of the colours. #1 looks better - poss without the tagline? Thanks.

  • 10 mars 2010 18:51 brightwire
    Porteur du Projet

    Oops! Please note a correction to the brief - the tagline should not be part of the logo, thanks.