In draft #24, the brandmark is excellent. Simple and bold. The font is too weak.
In draft # 19, the brandmark is too organic (but wildly creative). The font is excellent.
In draft #16 & 14, the brandmark is too complicated. We don't find a need for the name to be repeated. The font is excellent and the tag is nicely done, bold.
In draft #2, font and brandmark are is nicely done.
In draft #15, the castor like mark is nice, but looks like a sunrise. We are looking for a bolder font.
Drafts 8 & 7 do not prominently promote the brand name. Draft 1 & 2 have the corporate feel we are looking for. However, draft 1 does not include our colors. We would require redrafting 1with a rust orange, black, gray, and/or red color.
2 Commentaire récents
Porteur du Projet
In draft # 19, the brandmark is too organic (but wildly creative). The font is excellent.
In draft #16 & 14, the brandmark is too complicated. We don't find a need for the name to be repeated. The font is excellent and the tag is nicely done, bold.
In draft #2, font and brandmark are is nicely done.
In draft #15, the castor like mark is nice, but looks like a sunrise. We are looking for a bolder font.
Porteur du Projet