Mycroburst.com - Home
English | Français | العربية

877-525-5646

SALES: Mon-Sat, 9am-8pm EST
SUPPORT: Mon-Sat 9am-5pm EST



Start A Project Browse Projects

Paymentsite Logo

Paymentsite


How to run a successful design project


  • Project Report

Won

Draft selected as a winner

A Logo, Monogram, or Icon | Created by tem1206

  • Prize
    $550 Guaranteed
  • Drafts
    173
  • Close
  •  Winners
    1
    more info

Sort Drafts By:

  • Read Brief


Discussion

25 Recent Comments

  • December 10, 2010 11:30 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Wow! Nice logos everyone! We are planning to meet internally at 10 a.m. pst and will make a selection at that time. Thanks for your submissions.

  • December 10, 2010 1:22 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    General comment - many designs are very good. Thank you for submitting. We will have a vote in the morning to decide final winner. Anyblast minute designs will be looked at with the rest of my team. Thank you

  • December 10, 2010 1:16 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    110 - too flat. Needs more color and depth.

  • December 10, 2010 1:01 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    77 - the p is too artistic for us. Should be a more corporate looking logo.

  • December 10, 2010 12:56 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    74 & 75 - graphic does not represent our market or product line. Looking for something representative of what we do.

  • December 10, 2010 12:24 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 111/112 - does not really work. Graphic does not fit with our concept of tech, payments, etc

  • December 9, 2010 6:10 AM tomcost

    would u like to give some suggetions

  • December 9, 2010 12:18 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 96 - nice metal look, Font good, Graphic works too. Not bad.

  • December 9, 2010 12:17 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 95 - looks very nice. Good graphic.

  • December 9, 2010 12:16 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 94 - nice font choice. colors good. overall very nice

  • December 9, 2010 12:15 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 93 - nice design but not for us.

  • December 9, 2010 12:14 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 92 - I would have thought this would not work but it does. Nice. I am still leaning (or forcing myself to lean) towards a graphic at the left that is something other than a wispy PS.

  • December 9, 2010 12:10 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 86 - pretty good. I am struggling to make a connection with our overall product line beyond Property Management.

  • December 9, 2010 12:08 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 83 - nice colors. not sure about the graphic. It might need the s better defined. not sure yet...

  • December 9, 2010 12:07 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 55 - like the metallic look but after seeing it a couple of days it does not seem to represent our product line well.

  • December 9, 2010 12:03 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 82 - a bit too artistic for our product line. Need more edge, less soft lines etc.

  • December 8, 2010 11:59 PM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 80/81 - these do not relate in any way to our product line.

  • December 8, 2010 11:57 PM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 78 - too plain/common.

  • December 7, 2010 11:55 PM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 65 - I like this one. Nice font choice, colors and a clean look. Very nice.

  • December 7, 2010 11:51 PM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 61 - Very clean look.

  • December 7, 2010 10:45 PM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 60 - one of these might work. nice concept.

  • December 7, 2010 10:43 PM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 59 - We were looking for something that relates to our name, market or products.

  • December 7, 2010 10:38 PM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 45 - Using the graphic part of the logo as the first letter is not the type of logo we want.

  • December 7, 2010 1:12 AM tem1206
    Project Holder

    Draft 44 - Back to buildings... the outside oval ring should replace the inner small ring. having both is distracting. Still in the running but try something other than buildings.

    Draft 43 - I really like the bridge concept. But overall this Logo does not work. Color choice could be better and sizing of the bridge with respect to the words seems too large. font ok. right justified does not work though.

    Draft 41 - Interesting graphic. not sure what it represents but it works in a way. I am guessing this will not make the final cut by my team here though since it does not link to anything in our company.

    Draft 40 - ok. Reminds me of a large Q. the graphic should have color to differentiate the object, or some sort of shadow or other effect to set the objects apart I think so it does not look like a Q.

    Draft 39 - ok but the font could change to be something a little more corporate, less informal. Overall concept is refreshing. The PS is a nice change and the ring looks good. Still a 3 though...

    Draft 37 - Pretty good. Overall this nice. It reminds me of buildings but still works.

    Draft 35 - Nice color, font, layout and sizing. Overall it works. Definitely still in the running on this one.

  • December 5, 2010 1:06 PM tem1206
    Project Holder

    General Comment - My team here originally wanted a PS in the logo. I like the designs like this but I also the ones that have a graphic on left with the ring around them as long as they are not buildings. This part of the logo should depict the entire product line for Paymentsite. We have two main designs for this, a PS of some sort, or a graphic that somehow depicts our whole Paymentsite product line.



Debug toolbar